The wrong person in a transformation role costs 10–15× their salary.
APT fixes the match before the hire — not after.
10–15×
Cost of a failed executive hire
Gartner / HBR
88%
Transformations fail to achieve ambitions
Bain, 2024
18mo
When senior hires fail
40–60% of senior transformation hires
The Problem
Transformation hiring is broken at the root.
The problem is not strategy. It is not budget. It is the cognitive mismatch between the hire and the conditions of the role. Standard recruiting selects against transformation traits at every stage. CVs measure the past. Interviews reward presentation. Neither predicts performance in ambiguity.
88%
Transformations fail
Business transformations fail to achieve their ambitions (Bain, 2024)
70%
Digital initiatives fail
Digital transformation initiatives fail to meet objectives (BCG, 850+ companies)
50%
Senior hires fail
40–60% of senior transformation hires fail within 18 months
The cost of a failed executive hire: 10–15× annual salary (Gartner / HBR). This is not a rounding error. It is a structural, repeatable failure — and it is preventable.
Why Existing Approaches Fail
The incumbents are optimising for the wrong thing.
Every existing solution addresses a symptom. None addresses the root cause: no one assesses the role as rigorously as the candidate. No one matches on cognitive dimensions. No one tracks retention outcomes.
Traditional Headhunters
Korn Ferry, Egon Zehnder, Spencer Stuart
Match credentials to job description — not cognitive fit
No cognitive assessment whatsoever
20–25% fee, no retention data, no post-placement support
Fee paid regardless of outcome
Psychometric Tools
Hogan, Big Five, MBTI
Measure personality — not transformation-specific cognitive traits
Not integrated with recruiting workflow
No matching algorithm
No role context profiling
Internal HR / LinkedIn Sourcing
Speed over fit — selection bias toward available candidates
Zero predictive data on transformation performance
No structured cognitive or contextual evaluation
The gap: No one assesses the role as rigorously as the candidate. No one matches on cognitive dimensions. No one tracks retention outcomes.
The Solution
APT matches cognitive profile to role context. Before the hire.
Three integrated stages — each one addressing a failure mode that incumbents ignore entirely.
Stage 1 — CognitiveEdge Assessment
28-minute validated digital screen measuring 5 cognitive dimensions specific to transformation performance. No medical data. No diagnostic labels. GDPR-by-design.
Live at app.apt-match.com
Stage 2 — Role Context Profile
Structured brief defining the cognitive demands of the specific mandate: transformation complexity, decision autonomy, ambiguity level, cultural environment.
We assess the role as rigorously as the candidate.
Stage 3 — APT Match Score
Dimensional fit algorithm. Ranked shortlist of 2–4 candidates with predicted retention probability per dimension.
Not a guess — a structured case with reasoning behind every placement.
Product
5 dimensions. 28 minutes. No right or wrong answers.
Absorption & Drive
Sustained focus on complex, ambiguous problems
Ambiguity Tolerance
Decisive action without complete information
Decision Calibration
Strategic risk — not impulsive, not avoidant. Behavioural task, not self-report.
Inductive Reasoning
Pattern recognition under time pressure
Resilience & Recovery
Speed of return to action-capable state after setback
Key Differentiator
Dimension 3 — Decision Calibration — is a behavioural decision task. It is the only non-self-report dimension in the assessment.
It measures what people actually do, not what they think they do.
Every other psychometric tool on the market relies entirely on self-report. APT does not.
Live: app.apt-match.com
Market Size
$246 billion market. Growing at 5–10% CAGR. Zero cognitive-edge players.
$246B
Global executive search market
2025 baseline, growing to $407B by 2034 at 5.1% CAGR
$30B
Retained executive search
APT's addressable segment of the global market
€160M
DACH beachhead
~4,000 active transformation mandates/year at Director+ × €40K avg fee
Three beachhead segments
PE-backed Mittelstand
Post-merger integration. Cognitive fit is directly value-determining — the wrong hire delays integration and destroys deal value.
Series B/C Deep Tech
Scale-up execution. Ambiguity and speed-to-pattern are non-negotiable. Founders cannot afford a mis-hire at the leadership layer.
Transformation-heavy Corporates
Digitalisation, restructuring. The wrong hire sets the whole initiative back. Boards are increasingly accountable for transformation ROI.
APT fee = equivalent to one month of a failed transformation hire. Standard fees: 20–25% of first-year salary, no assessment, no retention data. The risk-adjusted case is arithmetic.
Business Model
Retained search fee + data licensing. Margin improves with every placement.
Revenue Streams
Stream 1 — Retained Search
20–25% of first-year compensation. Target: €40–55K per Director+ placement. Average Director+ salary DACH: €180–250K. Gross margin: ~70% (boutique model).
Stream 2 — Assessment API (Phase 2)
License CognitiveEdge to other recruiting firms as infrastructure. Transforms APT from boutique into category-defining platform.
Target Year 1: 20 placements → €800K–1.1M revenue
The Retention Data Flywheel
Every placement generates 90-day outcome data → better matching → better retention → higher pricing power → more mandates → more data.
This flywheel is the moat. It cannot be bought. It must be built.